Sunday, August 18, 2013

Dept. Health and Human Services (DHH) and/or World Health Organization (WHO) Charged with Pushing Vaccines that Harm Children

In a hard hitting editorial, the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics (IJME) has accused the WHO of promoting Pentavalent vaccine “by stating falsely that no adverse event following immunization (AEFI) has ever been reported with the vaccine.” The journal says this is contrary to facts.
...investigation into the deaths of children in Bhutan, Sri Lanka, India and Vietnam following use of Pentavalent vaccine. This vaccine  combines the Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus or DPT vaccine — long used in national immunization programs – with Hepatitis-B and H influenza-b  or Hib vaccine.
The IJME editorial says that On 4 May 2013 the Ministry of Health of Viet Nam suspended Quinvaxem - the Pentavalent combination used in that country — after 12 deaths and 9 other non-fatal serious adverse events. According to local news reports, all the babies who died were in good health prior to vaccination and had serious trouble breathing before dying shortly afterwards.
The WHO, which investigated the incident, said the deaths were not vaccine-related and claimed that  “Quinvaxem was prequalified by WHO and no fatal adverse event following immunization has ever been associated with this vaccine.”
The editorial points out that WHO had not disputed the death of 12 children soon after immunization and “therefore it is patently wrong and misleading for it to conclude that no fatal AEFI have ever been associated with the vaccine.”
This combination vaccine is not licensed for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration nor is it used in other developed countries, the editorial says.   But the WHO recommends this Pentavalent vaccine in developing countries, by piggy backing the Hepatitis-B and Hib vaccines on the well accepted DPT to increase uptake of Hepatitis B and Hib according to a write up on the GAVI web site.
Serious adverse reactions and deaths have now been reported with Pentavalentvaccine produced by other manufacturers and in a number of countries, the journal says.  Bhutan. Sri Lanka and Pakistan   have stopped using the vaccine, “following unexplained deaths soon after immunization.”

This leads is to an important question...

Why would HHS not want to disclose accurate risk information to parents? 

C)  HHS does not disclose that it is the patent holder on the HPV vaccine, and receives royalty checks on every dose of Merck's Gardasil and GSK's Cervarix.

HHS owns the patent through NIH, licenses the vaccine through FDA, recommends the vaccine through CDC, and is its own judge in vaccine injury cases through HRSA.

Did you know that the Dept. of HHS is the patent holder on the HPV vaccine, and receives royalty checks on every dose of Merck's Gardasil and GSK's Cervarix?" "HHS owns the patent through NIH, licenses the vaccine through FDA, recommends the vaccine through CDC, and is its own judge in vaccine injury cases through HRSA."
Adventures in Autism: Testimony on Maine LD 672 An Act Relating to Exemption from Immunization...

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Dr. Tenpenny on Vaccines

When you see the prices doctors pay to have VACCINES in their offices, you'll understand WHY they push so hard. If you have an inventory of a product, many with short expiration dates, you have to sell the product to recoup your expense.
 Check out some of these WHOLESALE prices that are paid for by YOUR insurance company (+ office visit fe + injection fee)...even though your "insurance" refuses to pay for vaccine injuries.

POLIO All Ages 10 Dose Vial 0.5mL Ea 1 @ $287.89

Ten pack of MMR $620. 
Pretty profitable to push vaccination.

On the Evening News tonight was a segment about the increasing rise in infertility in the US. As more and young girls/young women get sucked into the powerful Gardasil TV advertisements and the give in to the arm-twisting of their IGNORANT pediatricians, I believe 75% or more of young PEOPLE (male and female) willing will be infertile or have terrible difficulties trying to conceive. Vaccine Research Library (sadly) supports that I'm right:

"We documented here the evidence of the potential of the HPV vaccine to trigger a life-disabling autoimmune condition. The increasing number of similar reports of post HPV vaccine-linked autoimmunity and the uncertainty of long-term clinical benefits of HPV vaccination are a matter of public health that warrants further rigorous inquiry."

Thursday, August 8, 2013

By Names and Numbers We can SEE

Bayer Exposed ( HIV Contaminated Vaccine ) and POLIO Fraud

Polio definition fraud
Polio vaccine contamination
Polio vaccine damage
Causes of polio
1. Diet
2. Provocation polio, injections & pesticides
3. Tonsillectomy
4. Hygiene
Polio cured
The polio death rate was decreasing on its own before the vaccine was introduced, and there is no credible scientific evidence that the vaccine caused polio to disappear. Cases of polio increased after mass inoculations.
The United States Centre for Disease Control (CDC) admitted that the vaccine has become the dominant cause of polio in the US today, with 87% of cases between 1973 and 1983 caused by the vaccine. More recently, 1980-1989, every case of polio in the US was caused by the vaccine. Doctors and scientists on the staff of the National Institute of Health during the 1950's were well aware that the Salk vaccine was ineffective and deadly. Some frankly stated that it was "worthless as a preventative and dangerous to take". The Salk "inactivated" or "killed-virus" was actually regulated to permit 5,000 live viruses per million doses.
A large vaccine trial in 1955 showed a total failure of the Salk vaccine to protect against poliomyelitis. During a 1959 epidemic in Massachusetts, 77.5% of the paralytic cases had received three or more doses of the inactivated vaccine.
In 1956 with the infamous Francis Field Trials they discovered large numbers of children contracted polio after receiving the vaccine. Instead of removing the vaccine from the market, they decided to exclude from the statistics all cases of polio that occurred within 30 days after vaccination on the pretext that such cases were "pre-existing".
In 1958 mass vaccination triggered a disastrous increase in polio, the highest being 700% in Ottawa, Canada. The highest incidence in the USA occurred in those states which had been induced to adopt compulsory polio shots(1).
Four of the five Salk vaccine companies ceased producing this vaccine due to its failure, and because of the lawsuits against them.
"Use of either Salk or Sabin vaccine will increase the possibility that your child will contact the disease. It appears that the most effective way to protect your child from polio is to make sure that he doesn't get the vaccine "---Dr Mendelsohn M.D.(1984).
Where polio vaccination programs have been instituted worldwide, reported polio infections show a 700% increase as a result of compulsory vaccination.
Statistics on polio were manipulated. One such way was to redefine the disease, renaming it "viral or aseptic meningitis" or "cocksackie virus". In one US county, for example, in July 1955 there were 273 cases of polio reported for 50 cases of asceptic meningitis, compared to 5 cases of polio in 1966 and 256 cases of aseptic meningitis. These new diagnostic guideline's were issued by the CDC. If you object to polio vaccination, and you get polio--it is usually called "polio." If you have been vaccinated and you get "polio", it is called meningitis(2).
Coxsackievirus and echoviruses can cause paralytic syndromes that are clinically indistinguishable from paralytic poliomyelitis. (John H. Menkes, Textbook Of Child Neurology, 5th ed., page 420)
"Dr. Thomas Francis did not mention in his key evaluation of the 1954 Salk field trials that those who contracted polio after their first innoculation and before their second inoculation were placed in the "not-inoculated" list.' (Maurice B. Bayly, The Story Of The Salk Anti-poliomyelitis Vaccine, 1956).
Dr. Buchwald responds that prior to the introduction of polio vaccinations in Germany, anyone was counted as having polio, even if they only had the virus in their feces. It is known, he goes on, that there are people who are healthy but who evacuate polio viruses when they go to the bathroom. Based on this criteria, the number of cases was approximately 4,000 per year. After the introduction of the vaccine, statistics included only those polio cases of people who were paralyzed for at least six weeks.--Testimony of Dr Buchwald MD
A former public health officer, Dr Ratner, reported that just before the introduction of the first polio vaccine the National Foundation For Infant Paralysis was paying physicians $25 for each reported diagnosis. "A patient would walk into a doctors office with a limp from an accident. He'd say he had a fever a few days ago...and guess what the diagnosis would be?" It was well known Paralytic polio cured itself 50% of the time within 60 days. After the Salk vaccine was introduced, the definition of polio was changed by the CDC. Now, in order to have paralytic polio, you had to have it longer than 60 days(16).
Because the Salk vaccine was promoted as being incapable of causing polio, cases that occurred following administration of the vaccine were denied, and excluded from the Vaccine injury table(4)
Many doctors refuse to report vaccine reaction, and I worked out that of over 200 families of vaccine damaged children contacting JABS, the support group, only about 3% had been reported damaged by their doctor. In the USA the FDA admits that 90% of vaccine damage cases go unreported(4).
Dr. Bernard Greenberg, a biostatistics expert, was chairman of the Committee on Evaluation and Standards of the American Public Health Association during the 1950s. He testified at a panel discussion that was used as evidence for the congressional hearings on polio vaccine in 1962. During these hearings he elaborated on the problems associated with polio statistics and disputed claims for the vaccine's effectiveness. He attributed the dramatic decline in polio cases to a change in reporting practices by physicians. Less cases were identified as polio after the vaccination for very specific reasons. "Prior to 1954 any physician who reported paralytic poliomyelitis was doing his patient a service by way of subsidizing the cost of hospitalization and was being community-minded in reporting a communicable disease. The criterion of diagnosis at that time in most health departments followed the World Health Organization definition: "Spinal paralytic poliomyelitis: signs and symptoms of nonparalytic poliomyelitis with the addition of partial or complete paralysis of one or more muscle groups, detected on two examinations at least 24 hours apart." Note that "two examinations at least 24 hours apart" was all that was required. Laboratory confirmation and presence of residual paralysis was not required. In 1955 the criteria were changed to conform more closely to the definition used in the 1954 field trials: residual paralysis was determined 10 to 20 days after onset of illness and again 50 to 70 days after onset.... This change in definition meant that in 1955 we started reporting a new disease, namely, paralytic poliomyelitis with a longer-lasting paralysis. Furthermore, diagnostic procedures have continued to be refined. Coxsackie virus infections and aseptic meningitis have been distinguished from paralytic poliomyelitis. Prior to 1954 large numbers of these cases undoubtedly were mislabeled as paralytic poliomyelitis. Thus, simply by changes in diagnostic criteria, the number of paralytic cases was predetermined to decrease in 1955-1957, whether or not any vaccine was used.
"Official data shows that large scale vaccination has failed to obtain any significant improvement of the diseases against which they were supposed to provide protection"---Dr Sabin, developer of Polio vaccine.
Health officials convinced the Chinese to rename the bulk of their polio to Guillaine Barre Syndrome (GBS). A study found that the new disorder (Chinese Paralytic syndrome) and the GBS was really polio (41). After mass vaccination in 1971, reports of polio went down but GBS increased about 10 fold.
"In the WHO polio vaccine eradication in the Americas, there were 930 cases of paralytic disease—all called polio. Five years later, at the end of the campaign, roughly 2000 cases of paralytic disease occurred—but only 6 of them were called polio (41). The rate of paralytic disease doubled, but the disease definition changed so drastically that hardly any of it was called polio any more."—Greg Beattie
"They started vaccinating in 1985 (in the Americas). Within 4 months they had 350 cases…They caused a substantial, huge outbreak of polio but they started ‘discarding’ most of the cases (put as flaccid paralysis)."—Viera Scheibner (42).
Chronic Fatigue: A polio by another name
Bruno RL, et al.    Parallels between post-polio fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome: a common pathophysiology? Am J Med. 1998 Sep 28;105(3A):66S-73S. PMID: 9790485; UI: 99005146.      
"All vaccination has the effect of directing the three values of the blood into or toward the zone characteristics of cancer and leukaemia...Vaccines do predispose to cancer and leukaemia." Professor L. Vincent - founder of Bioelectronics
During the 1950's and 60's millions of people were contaminated with a cancer-causing monkey viruses called SV1 to SV40 (simian virus) from the polio vaccines due to using kidneys from the Rhesus macaques monkey to make the vaccines. Of these SV40 (the 40th one found!) was the most researched. It is commonly used by scientists to induce genetic changes in other viruses. In animals it causes large numbers to develop sarcomas (cancer), and decreases protein production leading to muscle wasting---symtoms of AIDS. The administration of Salk vaccine, in New Zealand (1956-66), with SV40 was related to the appearance of SSPE, 100 times greater than expected(1).
A study of 58,000 women who had received the IPV (killed virus) during the time that SV40 contaminated the vaccine (1959-1965) showed a thirteenfold increased risk of brain tumours in their children.
Another virus from monkeys--respiratory syncytial (RS) was found in the polio vaccine in 1956, where a relationship was found to respiratory tract illness.
That monkey viruses can be deadly was demonstrated when over 10 vaccine researchers died, after being bitten by monkeys, from monkey B virus--a herpes virus. One of these was a colleague of Sabin in 1932.
In 1976 researchers at the US bureau of Biologics found that 3 samples of Lederle polio vaccine contained between 1,000 and 100,000 simian viruses per ml. of vaccine, a much higher concentration than later safety regulations allowed (Kyle, 1992).
Not forgetting the slaughter of thousands of monkeys to make these vaccines.
A mass polio vaccination in Finland (1985) resulted in a higher incidence of Guillain-Barre (GBS) cases in the first two quarters (16 total) compared to a mean incidence of GBS in the population of 3 cases per quarter during a 6 year surveillance period, 1981-1986. Ten of these were diagnosed within 10 weeks after vaccination with OPV. The Vaccine Safety Committee has acknowledged that OPV causes both paralytic polio and Guillain-Barre syndrome.
Louis Pascal has demonstrated that AIDS originated in the Belgian Congo as a direct result of mass oral polio vaccination which was contaminated with another monkey virus---the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) and bovine retrovirus, again as a result of using African Green monkey and calves kidneys to make vaccines. If the green monkey had anything to do with AIDS it was through generously "donating" it's kidneys(1).
The AIDS virus is called Human T-Cell lymphoma/leukemia virus 3, or HTLV 3, since changed to HIV. Very similar to the monkey leukemia virus HTLV 4 (SIV), and almost identical to Visna sheep virus and Bovine Leukemia virus (BLV). Human Leukemia virus is HTLV 1, which looks like BLV and causes the same kind of disease in humans as it does in cattle, and is also virtually identical to STLV 1, another monkey virus(12). Myers et al (1992) asked whether HIV might simply be SIV adapting to a human host(1).
It doesn't take much to see how the polio vaccine can cause leukemia in children. "Many here voice a silent view that the Salk and Sabin vaccine, being made of monkey kidney tissue....has been directly responsible for the major increase in leukemia in this country"---Dr Klenner, M.D.(19)
"Within a few years of the polio vaccine we started seeing some strange phenomena like the year before the first 300,000 does were given in the United States childhood leukaemia had never struck in children under the age of two. One year after the first onslaught they had the first cases of children under the age of two that died of leukaemia........ Dr Herbert Radnor observed that in a small area of this little town, in an area where no cases of leukaemia had been expected or at the most one in 4 years according to previous statistics, they suddenly had a rash like an epidemic within a few blocks"---Dr Snead
Leukemia also has a mercury component, also found in the DPT, Hib, & Hep B vaccines with the mercury solution Thimerosal. A dentist, Dr Pinto, cured a girl of Leukemia by removing her mercury amalgam fillings. To prove his point, to her sceptical doctor, he replaced the amalgam, and the leukemia came back. He removed them again and the Leukemia went away again(17)
Mercury is used in laboratories to induce auto-immune disease in animals(17). Formaldehyde, found in the polio, HepB, and DPT vaccines is a known carcinogen. The DTP also contains sodium chloride, sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid and aluminium. The MMR contains neomycin, an antibiotic. The Hib also contains saccarides, sodium chloride & aluminium hydroxide. The Hep B also contains aluminium hydrochloride and sodium chloride(4).
"Thimerosol is the preservative in immunisation shots, so anytime you get an immunisation shot you are undergoing the same procedure that in the University Lab that we used to give animals auto-immune disease---give a little tiny injection of mercury.  And when you get an immunisation shot you are getting a little tiny dose of mercury there."---Hall Huggins DDS

Three shots of these chemicals and metals plus bacteria and viruses: diptheria, pertussis, tetanus, influenza type b, (plus hepatitis B in America), & 3 types of polio with the DPT, Hib, and Polio vaccines into babies before 4 months of age! Then the MMR at 12-18 months. Then again at 4 years. Twenty one vaccine mixtures before 5 years.

Fear of Unvaccinated? Why? I thought you were protected with a vaccination?

Green Med Info: "I find it fascinating that someone called us "anti-vaccine" for posting this. If anything we are pro-children's health, and are deeply concerned over the studies we have indexed indicating the adverse health effects of vaccinating against many of the pathogens that are self-limiting, only rarely result in lasting morbidity and furthermore help to build self-tolerance and lasting immunity, are in fact far greater than the adverse effects caused by these so-called 'vaccine preventable' diseases. How is this anti-vaccine? It is pro vaccine awareness, as far as what they actually do, versus their marketed and check-book science obtained claims. To take a look at our so-called "anti-vaccine" research you can go here to form a more accurate opinion about our advocacy and research: "

The Coming Push to Give HPV Vaccines to Infants

Paper published this past week in the American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. HPV vaccines like Gardasil and Cervarix trigger primary ovarian failure. It is clear now why Japan recently withdrew its support for HPV vaccination of its young girls with the country struggling with a very low and worrisome fertility rate.
Why are we not taking the hint from other countries? Is the US always the last to ban dangerous chemicals, vaccines, food, etc...?
If you can push the most dangerous vaccines in use today on teen and pre-teen girls, and later on boys of the same age, without any proof that they work, then why not give them to newborn infants—plus another ‘booster’ later on? That appears to be planned for Gardasil and Cervarix, along with a slick new marketing program, thanks to the vaccine-industrial complex.
Fear Bringer, by Cap CatRagu
Fear Bringer, by Cap CatRagu, Syringes Added
by Heidi Stevenson
The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database shows clearly that the vaccines with the most reported adverse effects are Gardasil and Cervarix, the two human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines. It would obviously be madness to lower the age at which they’ve given—but that appears to be exactly what’s being planned.
As Gaia Health has documented, these vaccines have not yet been shown to be effective in preventing cancer, and may even cause the disease. In fact, the document released by the FDA to justify Gardasil stated that women who are infected with HPV at the time of vaccination are 44.6% more likely to develop cervical dysplasias.[1] This is not a minor issue, yet it is routinely ignored in the rush to vaccinate.
So why should we be surprised to find that the search for excuses to lower the age of vaccination is in full force?

The Justification

A review published in the journal Vaccine was produced to justify injecting the HPV vaccines into tiny babies.[2] The authors wrote:
On a global scale, vaccination of newborns and infants is well established and has developed a successful working infrastructure. The hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination programs offer a model for HPV introduction in which newborn and infant immunization achieves a rapid reduction in the prevalence of the HBV carrier rates in immunized cohorts of children, and of liver cirrhosis and liver cancer decades later. [Emphasis mine.]
They consider giving babies the hepatitis B vaccine on the day of birth to be a model for reducing the age of HPV vaccination. Rather than vaccinating girls shortly before or near puberty, they’re suggesting that they be vaccinated as infants.
Nowhere in the document do they even consider the potential of adverse effects! Gardasil has recently been associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS),[3] the disease that Stephen Hawking has. Japan has withdrawn its recommendation for HPV vaccines because of severe adverse effects.[4]
UK Reported Adverse Effects for Cervarix and Other VaccinesThe number of Cervarix adverse effects reported in the UK is shown in this graph from a study published inCurrent Pharmaceutical Design.[5] The reported harm produced by this vaccine dwarfs that of any other vaccine.
Yet, the authors of “Reframing Cervical Cancer Prevention: Expanding the Field Towards Prevention of Human Papillomavirus Infections and Related Diseases”[2] want to push the age for jabbing children downward to infancy. By the way, they also think that there would be no problem with giving a booster dose at the age girls are now vaccinated, as if the vaccine produces no harm!
There is no consideration given to adverse effects. There is no consideration given to the increased burden on babies with not only another vaccine, but the one that’s known to produce some of the worst and most common adverse effects of any vaccine.

Conflicts of Interest

It was financed by major governmental agencies, including the European Commission, the Instituto de Salud CarlosII of the Spanish government, and the Agència de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca–Generalitat de Catalunya of the Catalonian government. The authors and their employers are:
  • F. Xavier Bosch: Cancer Epidemiology Research Program (CERP), Institut Català d’Oncologia–Catalan Institute of Oncology, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat (Barcelona), Spain
  • Vivien Tsu: Director of PATH’s HPV vaccine projects, Seattle, WA, USA—a partner of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Alex Vorsters and Pierre Van Damme: Centre fo the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium
  • Mark A. Kane: Consultant on Immunization Policy, Mercer Island, WA, USA
The authors’ employers are obviously are deeply tied to the vaccine industry. However, their personal ties to the vaccine-industrial complex is stunning:
  • Bosch has conducted HPV vaccine trials and epidemiological studies for GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Sanofi Pasteur MSD. He does screening and HPV testing trials supported by Qiagen, and takes travel grants and honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Sanofi Pasteur MSD, Roche, and Qiagen.
  • Tsu did not declare any conflicts of interest. However, she was in charge of a Gates Foundation-funded HPV vaccine trial in India that came under attack for ethics violations by the Indian government. Subjects were selected from vulnerable uneducated tribal populations, consent was not properly obtained, and adverse events were not properly recorded. Tsu excused the ethical lapses because they were “the sorts of issues that the study was intended to tease out”![6] Aside from that, one must wonder how she can possibly suggest that she has no conflict of interest when her entire salary is dependent on promoting the vaccine dealt with by this review.
  • Van Damme is chief and principal investigator for vaccine trials conducted on behalf of the University of Antwerp, which gets grants from vaccine manufacturers. He also takes speakers’ fees for vaccine presentations and is secretary of the Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board.
  • Vorsters is a member of the executive secretariat of the Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board, which is supported by grants from GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Sanofi Pasteur MSD, and Merck.
  • Kane is a member of the Merck Advisory Board for the HPV vaccine and receives consulting fees, honoraria, and travel support from Merck.
Why should we trust a study steeped in money from the Big Pharma corporations that would benefit by moving the age for HPV vaccination to infancy, and adding a booster jab at the age it’s now given? The complete lack of consideration for the harm produced by HPV vaccines is shocking, even in a group as deeply enthralled to the corporations they’re promoting. You would think that they’d at least put on a show of concern, but there isn’t a hint of it.

Selling Infant Vaccinations

The article subtly reveals that the HPV vaccine was not originally intended to be used solely for cervical cancer in women, that it has always been intended for a variety of cancers. So, apparently, girls were being used as guinea pigs, both to figure out how to sell the vaccine and to ascertain adverse effects … or, more likely, as this review seems to imply, to see how far they could push a vaccine with horrific and common adverse effects. Certainly, all the girls who’ve been given HPV vaccines have been treated in a most cavalier manner, since Gardasil was tested on rat testes, but not on ovaries!
Now that it’s obvious that the HPV vaccine is exceptionally dangerous, the effort seems to be on how to hide the risks. If there’d been any concern, then why didn’t these authors bother to include adverse effects in their calculations?
The authors’ concern had nothing to do with the lives lost and devastated. Instead, it was for the poor sales job done with HPV vaccines. They think that the process of pushing them on people would have gone much more smoothly if, instead of referring to them as “cancer preventing”, they had said that the vaccines prevent “HPV-related disease”.
So, you can expect to see a subtle change in how officials refer to HPV vaccines. Instead of discussing cancer, in particular cervical cancer, you’ll likely start hearing references to HPV-related diseases—with an emphasis on the plural. They’re going to sell vaccination of infants as a multi-cancer preventive. Parents who refuse to allow the HPV vaccine, for girls or boys, will be accused of dooming their children to a huge array of cancers. How’s that for a marketing technique?


  1. Gardasil™ HPV Quadrivalent VaccineMay 18, 2006 VRBPAC Meeting, Table 17 on page 13
  2. Reframing Cervical Cancer Prevention. Expanding the Field Towards Prevention of Human Papillomavirus Infections and Related DiseasesVaccine; F. Xavier Bosch, Vivien Tsu, Alex Vorsters, Pierre Van Damme, Mark A. Kane;
  3. CDC Takes Closer Look at Gardasil and Paralysis; U.S. News & World Report
  4. Japan Withdraws HPV Vaccine Recommendation for Girls; Medscape
  5. Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccines as an Option for Preventing Cervical Malignancies: (How) Effective and Safe?Current Pharmaceutical Design; Tomljenovic L, Spinosa JP, Shaw CA.
  6. Vaccine trial’s ethics criticizedNature

APS and Autism - Mark Blaxill

My illness ( Antophospholipid {APS}) relates to what is happening with the Autism epidemic... denial in science, statistics and common sense. Follow the money.. who profits?... financial profits are in a business and business runs our country through lobbies... our legislatures are paid
huge sums by lobbies... this gets them elected... to further the goals of business. We do not receive any personal profit by action that furthers business that endangers our health, but our illnesses do profit business that feed off our medical problems... face it the medical community is a business... Individuals within a business who do not follow the rules of the business will not be allowed to engage in business... All their young dreams of success depends on the success of the business... once caught up in this corruption they are then the willing slaves of the business... necessitating denial in science, statistics and common sense to fit the goals... that make profits for a business. Whew... hard to explain, but as an individual who wants to stay healthy; I ask businesses to get busy and evaluate what the people need or the people will not be there for you to feed off neither physically or mentally... Dead on the side of the road or wandering around dithering in the streets... the change comes from the courage and the care to stand up, be heard and keep repeating yourself...YES no one cares, but you and a few; the rest are busy making profits.

December 23, 2009

Mark Blaxill: Lies, Damned Lies and CDC Autism Statistics
By Mark Blaxill

It’s official now, real autism rates have exploded to 1 in 100 American children. We’re facing a national public health emergency of historic proportions. Bigger than swine flu. Bigger than polio. Bigger than almost anything one can imagine except AIDS. No matter how hard some may try, it’s impossible to escape the inexorable upward march of the numbers. Even Tom Insel, head of autism research at NIH and not exactly the autism world’s greatest forward thinker, has conceded the obvious: “There is no question that there has got to be an environmental component here.”...
...Nowhere is the institutional pattern of negligence, deception and propaganda surrounding autism more apparent than in the work of the Autism Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) network. The design of the ADDM, a project of the CDC and its parent agency the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), reveals in sharp relief how determined CDC is to evade its autism responsibilities.

The link to the comments above has a complete run down on the run around by the government on the issue, unless you take a look you would never believe it.

Dr. Max Wiznitzer of University Hospitals in Cleveland is an expert witness for the government, and he fights against families who file for compensation in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.  He made a mistake when he admitted that autism rates in the Amish community are somewhere around 1 in 10,000.   The rate for the rest of us is now about 1 in 95, and growing rapidly.  That means that our children are over 100 times more likely to get autism, and this does not take into account that the numbers are skewed against the Amish, since a tiny portion of their children are actually vaccinated now.
We will be waiting for real outbreaks of autism in the unvaccinated Amish.  If you're still unsure about the cause of autism, and are looking for studies; read How To Cure Autism and The Time Bomb of Mercury Poisoning.  Studies which attempt to disprove the link between autism and vaccination have all been funded by the pharmaceutical complex.  Truly independent studies have repeatedly shown the clear relationship.  In fact, no vaccine has ever undergone any independent, controlled, double-blind studies to determine safety and effectiveness.  Seriously. Read the studies yourself, research extensively, and do the right thing.  Opt out of vaccinations with a religious or philosophical exemption to defend your child.  The public schools cannot legally turn you away if you do that, so learn your rights, and use them!  Do it, or someday your own children will curse you for not doing the right thing.

Bedrock of vaccination theory crumbles as science reveals antibodies not necessary to fight viruses

"It turns out that the body’s natural immune systems, comprised of both innate and adaptive components, work together to ward off disease without the need for antibody-producing vaccines.

While the medical, pharmaceutical, and vaccine industries are busy pushing new vaccines for practically every condition under the sun, a new study published in the journal Immunity completely deconstructs the entire vaccination theory."

Do you think this info will be ignored, like all the info from science that has shown us pesticides do horrible damage to our bodies and the Earth. Remember , 1 in 100 of children vaccinated get autism, while the unvaccinated Amish population have a 1 in 10,000 rate of autism.

Jon Rappoport agrees with me, and points to chemical and biological pollution as the cause and virus used to cover up the mess.
    "“Oh, the mosquito carries the West Nile virus!” Really? Even if no one ever found such a virus?
    Remember Swine Flu? The whole planet was going to go down. In the end, WHO announced the total global death figure as 20,000. Then, in a mindless burst of revisionism this year, the total was changed to 580,000.

     Here’s a number for you. Three maniacal spokespeople from the CDC, backed by five major television networks, can brainwash the public about a virus in seven days.

The Vaccine Hoax is Over

Freedom of Information Act in the UK filed by a doctor there has revealed 30 years of secret official documents showing that government experts have:

1. Known the vaccines don’t work
2. Known they cause the diseases they are supposed to prevent
3. Known they are a hazard to children
4. Colluded to lie to the public
5. Worked to prevent safety studies

"The eye-opening, 45-page paper goes on to explain how vaccine schedules were established through the calculated downplaying of vaccine safety concerns and the over-inflating of vaccine benefits; the promotion of dangerous new vaccines into the pediatric schedule through deception; the discouraging of vaccine safety follow-up studies; and the widespread brainwashing of the public through manipulation and scientific sleight-of-hand tricks."

Be sure to check out the complete study for yourself:
The Vaccine Hoax is Over
By coto2admin
By Andrew Baker
Food Freedom News

Did you esp. note #5 above?
And you are asking why is this on my blog? Because of here...

Pesticide Phase-out and Vaccinations
DDT and BHC were phased out from the developed nations and at the same time vaccination programs were dramatically credited with saving these countries from the ravages of the poliovirus (see Homepage). However, the banned pesticides continued with higher than ever total distribution in the under-developed countries thanks to W.H.O.'s anti-mosquito campaigns, where to this day acute flaccid paralysis (AFP), polio, and DDT/BHC still prevail. DDT application, DDT phase-out programs, and polio vaccination programs are all being directed in these countries concurrently by the World Health Organization.

Registration for DDT was canceled in 1968. and DDT was banned by the EPA in 1972 -- after the major organochlorines (DDT, BHC) had been gradually phased out of the U.S. market by the chemical industry and replaced with the less environmentally persistent pesticides, the organophosphates.

In 1983, via new legislation, DDT was allowed back into the U.S. marketplace, but only in pesticide blends. Within only a few months of this re-entry, a new kind of polio epidemic suddenly occurred. It was labeled "post-polio", the re-emergence of polio symptoms in former victims. This has involved approximately 600,000 victims and is the graph above. Like most of the data on this website, this correlation is not even a whisper in the mainstream media.
Central nervous system diseases other than polio continue in the U.S. and throughout the world: acute flaccid paralysis, chronic fatigue syndrome, encephalitis, meningitis, muscular sclerosis, and rarely in humans, rabies....

According to immunity and vaccination theories, if anyone should be immune to polio, it should be former polio victims, however, numerous studies of post-polio victims have found evidence of active poliovirus.

From NIH's PubMed, four studies:
PMID: 7611631, UI: 95336052 (London, May, 1995) This study also quotes "a previous study"
PMID: 7611630, UI: 95336051 (Bethesda, MA, May, 1995)
PMID: 8818905, UI: 96415998 (Lyon, France, Aug., 1996
Polio images are projected as if this data doesn't exist. It does not appear that money is being funneled into these kinds of studies.

Farr's Law
Farr's Law requires, for an epidemic to be a valid example of contagion, that the epidemic increase its incidence rates exponentially. Since polio has been ubiquitous since the beginning of human history, its incidence rate should have peaked long ago and universal immunity conferred, if immunity was ever required, and if the poliovirus was actually a predator.

Polio's non-compliance with Farr's Law is explained by viropathologists with a unique argument, the inverse of the argument usually given to support germ theory.
The argument is that the poliovirus, which has been intimate with mankind since the beginning of history, suddenly became estranged from humans because of modern hygiene, and thus humans lost their natural immunity to the virus.
 So it is modern hygiene and the resulting lack of exposure to the virus that is said to have caused the polio epidemics to rage as never before.

It is interesting that for only one brief moment, viropathologists are willing to become eco-nutritional types who appreciate the value of natural breast feeding and the importantance of the internal microbiological ecology conferred positively upon humans by dirt. "

I felt forced to get my dog a vaccination to comply with my contract to live in my apt. yesterday. The Vet was so nice, and it just seemed so damn important. I just let it happen.
At least I wasn't bambozooled like last year when not only the vaccines, but also a can of pesticide for fleas for 25 bucks (I knew I would never use-I showed the doc my missing fingers and everything) and a 6mo. supply of a super pesticide pill for $110 (that made my dog psyco and lick her butt non-stop.
I had to get off the internet for a yr, because the humm of my computer made her get super scared.) She is doing well and is very happy today.
They cleaned out my account for the next 3 weeks-I was so broke. These people are in a business, with high overhead and the pressure to sell to stay in business or for big vacations.
The same goes for doctors who treat us...Business... Seems like there is some monkey bizness going on. And we are all being victimized.

Vaccine bombshell: Baby monkeys develop autism symptoms after obtaining doses of popular vaccines

"Following a recent study conducted by scientists at the University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania which revealed that many infant monkeys given standard doses of childhood vaccines as part of the new research,developed autism symptoms, question marks over the ultimate safety of vaccines have come to the fore."...
The groundbreaking research findings presented at the International Meeting for Autism Research (IMFAR) in London, England, have revealed that young macaque monkeys given the typical CDC-recommended vaccination schedule from the 1990s, and in appropriate doses for the monkeys’ sizes and ages, tended to develop autism symptoms. Theirunvaccinated counterparts, on the other hand, developed no such symptoms, which points to a strong connection between vaccines and autism spectrum disorders.
“The full implications of this primate study await publication of the research in a scientific journal,” said Wrangham. “But we can say that it demonstrates how the CDC evaded their responsibility to investigate vaccine safety questions. Vaccine safety oversight should be removed from the CDC and given to an independent agency.”

According to the Merck Manual - Vaccine-induced Encephalitis

"To put this vaccine scandal in perspective, the CDC states that ‘seizures can occur after vaccination,’ 33% of infants who have a first seizure will have more seizures and 10% of infants who have one seizure can develop epilepsy.
According to the Merck Manual (the largest-selling medical textbook), seizures are a symptom of encephalitis, which the Merck Manual defines as a vaccine adverse reaction.
Vaccine-induced encephalitis can leave a spectrum of permanent brain damage in its wake – post-encephalitic syndrome (aka epilepsy and autism).
In other words, kids that have convulsions from Afluria can have lifelong neurological disabilities..."

Natasha Bita, a journalist for The Australian has just won a Walkley Award (the Australian equivalent of a Pulitzer Prize) for an in-depth article series on the CSL Afluria flu vaccine, a shot that caused convulsions in one percent of Australian infants who received it.

  "Incredibly, the defective CSL flu vaccine Afluria is still on the market in the US: FDA-approved and CDC-recommended. The only concession US vaccine authorities have made to this Afluria scandal is to raise the recommended age for this vaccine, but even that feeble response is colored by a direction to give Afluria to young kids anyway if no other flu vaccine is available.

This vaccinate-at-any-cost mentality displays the utter depravity of US vaccine authorities. They really don’t care about vaccine adverse reactions or the victims of defective vaccines. When vaccine regulators are so transparently irresponsible, it is up to individuals and families to defend their own health by rejecting the gung-ho vaccine recommendations of the CDC, FDA and medical profession.

This award is a smack in the face to asleep-at-the-wheel US journalists, who are being instructed by the National Press Foundation (at the behest of Seth Mnookin, Gates’ GAVI vaccine alliance and minions of Paul Offit) to censor all negative reports on vaccine issues and stick to big pharma’s and the CDC’s party line."
Posted on November 28, 2011 by The Refusers

All the info is out there. Can you imagine?

“There is no such thing in America as an independent press, unless it is in the country towns.

You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to writes (sic) his honest opinions, and if you did you know beforehand that it would never appear in print.

I am paid one hundred and fifty dollars a week for keeping my honest opinions out of the paper I am connected with–others of you are similar salaries for similar things–and any of you who would be so foolish as to write his honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job.

The business of the New York journalist is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of Mammon, and to sell his race and his country for his daily bread.

You know this and I know it, and what folly is this to be toasting an “Independent Press.”

We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping-jacks; they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.”

John Swinton, editor of the New York Tribune, in the 1880s, at a banquet of his fellow editors

Congressional Testimony - Mark Blaxill

Mark Blaxill trys to tell the powers that be about the reality of our children being harmed. He is part of the Age of Autism Magazine, where he investigates and writes about this horror. You will learn that 1 in 33 children in New Jersey are autistic....
Mark can be found on this blog tearing apart the statisic of Gov. studies. And a very good job too. The studies are manipulated and massaged into the way it will work only for the Vaccine proponents benefit. Hmmumph....fooled again we are....But we will fix this. It's our money, or our lives...Like being held up at gun point! Be invincible; stand-up like Mark Blaxill does here.

This will take you into the committee's room...

Rep. Carolyn Maloney grilling CDC's Colleen Boyle on exploding rates of autism and the sheer number of shots. "I don't want to hear that we have 'better detection'"...

"Testing" the Anthrax Vaccine on Children

SPEAK OUT! The Presidential Commission set forth to evaluate "Testing" the Anthrax Vaccine on Children will likely proceed to do so, as unconscionable as it is. I saw the BioEthics(?) meeting of 1/15/13 and they have created every excuse in the book to make this appear reasonable. We must STOP them.

Sallie explains about our soldiers and children being the main targets. The fallacies, doctors forced  to give vaccines, and having to get an unaffordable lawyer to get an exemption, and turning the tables. 

New Legislation: "Henceforth, All Vaccines will be Tested on Elected Officials ...and Administration Appointees"

Also see my blog for two older bills:


2) The construction of a "National Memorial to Vaccine Victims" on the Mall in Washingtion, DC

More info on the Commission here:

To your health!, Sallie
Sallie O. Elkordy for NYC Public Advocate
Thank-you Sallie...The Mother Earth and All Children of the Planet Earth are Grateful...

Wrote a paper in school on this 15 years ago. This is really happening... kids being used in experiments are taken from poor families, kept in a hospital setting where they are denied food and subjected to tests out the butt to "study them."
 A radio show called coast to coast am recently had a debate on vaccines.
1st part was a Dr. Bloom, who loves vaccines. He tripped up when he talked about that Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR Fourth Edition) The book offers about 900 pages on symptom diagnosis. He kept referring to this book, but never told people it was psychiatrists making the diagnosis for Autism. He always used the word "people" when referring to who is making the diagnosis. Omitting shows evasion; pretending it scares people (if he did) is wrong. Cause those "People" are scary and fake. Psychiatrist make money from a made-up system  that's perverted; to up the anty in every new addition of the DSM-IV.
Schizophrenia is an illness where people hear talking in their brain, and respond to this invisible friend. Actually; a timing problem in consciousness is causing a non-synchronization in the electrical repose of the brain and easily fixed.
A "video game" developed can calibrate and correct timing .
The medications given to schizophrenics is horrid, and is a chemical shock therapy. Personal, and caring method that works is not recognized, because no money can be made off such action.
Families suffer when a member has this problem, and it can be fixed 100%...telling

Very telling, on the show; the other side, of the debate..
A Natural Health Practitioner from Switzerland (RED FLAG) who was just as bad.
No a mention of illnesses targeted by vaccines caused by poisons in our environment. Natural huh?
On this blog find out about Switzerland area for focus on the truth of our poisoners. You will find out that the UN and WHO (World Health Organization) is really located there. Did you know?

Dangerous Vaccines Found to Cause Symptoms of Shaken Baby Syndrome

'Over the years, parents have more and more commonly been blamed of child abuse if their child is diagnosed with the “triad” of injuries associated with Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) after receiving a vaccine. The “triad” includes bleeding inside the brain, bleeding behind the eyes and swelling or inflammation of the brain.

When a medical professional suspects that a baby has been violently shaken, they will examine the baby for the “triad” of injuries associated with SBS. These are subdural haematoma (bleeds inside the brain), retinal haemorrhages (bleeds behind the eyes) and cerebral edema (swelling or inflammation inside the brain).
Researchers Uncover The Truth

Early this year, Dr. Michael Innis published his latest peer-reviewed study in Clinical Medicine Research. His paper titled Autoimmunity and Non-Accidental Injury in Children discusses the cases of five children suffering from brain injuries and fractures after vaccinations. After studying each case in depth, he concluded that vaccination could be responsible for the triad of injuries commonly associated with SBS. [11]

In his paper, Dr. Innis outlines that the response to antigenic stimulation damaged the beta cells in the pancreas causing hypoinsulinaemia (unusually low levels of insulin in the blood), which inhibited the cellular uptake of vitamin C, resulting in liver dysfunction, failure of carboxylation of the vitamin K dependent proteins, resulting in hemorrhages and fractures associated with the triad. He concluded that fractures, retinal and subdural hemorrhages and encephalopathy in children are autoimmune responses to antigenic stimulation in a genetically susceptible individual.

He explains that common antigens are mandated vaccines, viral, bacterial and parasitic infections.

To understand exactly how cases of vaccine damage are frequently misdiagnosed as SBS, please read Dr. Innis’s paper in full.

I found his paper easy to read, interesting and revealing and I was particularly enlightened to see him open his paper by quoting the work of psychologist Lisa Blakemore-Brown, who in 1995-1996 became the first professional to identify that parents were being falsely accused of child abuse after their child had suffered a vaccine injury.
Do You Need More Proof?

Many other professionals support the fact that parents are being falsely accused of SBS. In 2008, Kent R. Holcomb published the paper Shaken Baby Syndrome: Actual Innocence Petition, in which he demonstrated that the Shaken Baby Syndrome theory was unstable by using a “hypothetical case.” [12]

In his paper, Holcomb states that the biomechanical branch of science is the one and only discipline with the expertise, experimental data, and responsibility to determine if a biomechanical event such as human shaking (SBS) or lethal minor falls (LMF) can or cannot cause potentially fatal injuries such as subdural hematoma (SDH).

For years, the triad of injuries has been the only evidence used in criminal procedures to convict parents of shaking their babies. According to a growing number of professionals, this misguided trust has resulted in many innocent parents being charged and convicted of murder.

However, times are changing, and as Holcomb explains, the history of medicine is full of examples of practices that, during their times, were generally accepted by a consensus of medical opinion, only to be later rejected as useless, potentially harmful, or sometimes even lethal.

Professionals are recognizing that Shaken Baby Syndrome is an unsafe diagnosis, due to the evidence being presented with the use of biomechanics. According to Holcomb, the study of biomechanics has proven that humans lack the physical strength needed to cause fatal brain injuries from manual shaking alone. He says that if a child were to be shaken as described in SBS cases, then this violence would result in a high incidence of spinal paralysis from neck injuries in infants, which has never been reported in association with SBS.

In 2009, Holcomb published a paper titled Justification for a Federal Injunction to Suspend All Vaccine Licenses Based on Unreasonable Health Risks and Causal Links to Chronic Disease Pandemics.

Holcomb states very clearly that vaccines are unsafe at all levels. He says that a hypothesis is not proven until all the data has been read. He says:

“When evaluating vaccine-safety-hypotheses, like all other hypotheses, the SHHS (Secretary of Health and Human Services) cannot accept the hypothesis as proven nor upgrade it to scientific theory, until said hypothesis is submitted to vigorous scientific testing and until all attempts at falsification have failed.

- See more at:

Shaken Baby Syndrome: Pitfalls in Diagnosis and Demographics
"In other words: In 32 years, there were only 324 cases reported in the English medical literature that had enough details to be properly reviewed. In 54 of them, someone admitted to have actually shaken the infant and of these, only 11 cases appeared to have been just “shaken”. That’s 11 cases!

The medical and child protective agency determination 
Such determination is only valid if careful and detailed history of past events is obtained. I have seen several medical records of SBS cases that had the statement “The past history was non-contributory.” In almost every one, my careful review yielded plenty of useful information and, indeed, very “contributory factors.” Every detail of the pregnancy, the delivery, the nursery stay and the period after discharge from the nursery is important. Vaccinations received within 21 days of an ALTE (apparent life-threatening event) should be listed and critically reviewed; “immunizations are up to date” is often the only mention found.

In addition, clinical and radiological findings obviously could have been misinterpreted and laboratory investigations could have been lacking, including a histamine blood level, serum Vitamin C and a PIVKA II test for vitamin K deficiency to name a few.

In 2004, a conviction for inflicted TBI was reversed because of problems with the autopsy and related testimony at the original trial. (6) The baby’s father, who was sentenced to a life sentence plus 10 years for child abuse and aggravated murder, had already served seven years.

When reading the Keenan study, one is unable to know how seriously the following three important aspects of the so-called shaken baby syndrome were reviewed or if they were at all.

Neck tissues injury
Every record of suspected SBS should describe traumatic findings in the neck structures. Famed researcher Werner Goldsmith, PhD, has stated, "I am absolutely convinced that in order to do serious or fatal damage to an infant by shaking you have to have soft tissue neck damage…. A fall backward from three feet onto a hard surface, like concrete, can produce nearly 180 Gs of acceleration — 180 times the force of Earth's gravity — enough to cause a subdural hematoma. Shaking a child once a second through a range of one foot produces only 11 Gs, at the most…. There is an order of magnitude difference between shaking and falling…. From the point of view of the brain, shaking is a much, much milder form of braking than a fall…. To complicate matters, between five and 10 percent of children are born with undiagnosed subdural hematomas, and 30 percent are born with retinal bleeding…. If you get a rebleed, you may get something that looks like shaken baby syndrome…. You should be able to show neck damage to prove shaken baby syndrome." Goldsmith is the former chair of the head injury model committee of the National Institutes of Health, and was a professor of mechanical engineering at the University of California, Berkeley and the recipient of the 2001 Distinguished Engineering Alumnus Award.

When the occupants of a stopped car (including infants in car seats) are hit from the rear by a truck going 30 to 40 miles an hour, the most likely injury is a whiplash of the neck. Subdural and retinal hemorrhages simply do not occur....
An excellent strategy to keep alive the belief that SBS is an entity caused by intentional shaking to the point of brain damage and possibly death is to:

*Appear to report in excruciating detail all apparently conceivable data relating to head injuries in children.

*Avoid mentioning vaccinations, when the two groups least allowed to choose anything other than compliance with vaccine recommendations, military dependents and non-Caucasians, are those "found" to be most likely to intentionally inflict TBI.

*With the exuberant use and additions of new pediatric vaccines, such as RotaTeq® that joined the list a few days ago (due at the 2, 4 and 6 months visits), the role of vaccinations in causing apnea, seizures and symptoms mimicking SBS should at least be evaluated before being summarily dismissed. "